Navarro, McNally and the Fight for the Middle of the Court
The US Open second round has a way of putting neighbours in the same room. Emma Navarro, seeded 26, and Caty McNally know each other's games the way you know the creak in a familiar staircase, and they have now met at this exact stage of this exact tournament in consecutive years. What makes the rematch interesting is that they arrive from opposite weather: Navarro out of a long, rain-interrupted survival job against Lois Boisson, McNally out of an efficient afternoon against a qualifier. Both are Americans, so the crowd will be split, and neither has a title to defend — only a stage to get past.
Emma Navarro is feeling more like herself, and she needed every bit of it
Navarro's first round was less a statement than an escape. She was pushed backwards early by Boisson's power, still edged the opening set, and led by a set and a break when rain sent everyone home for the night. On the resumption she was broken while trying to finish, lost the tie-break, then fell behind an early break in the decider — and only then, visibly drained, broke straight back, held firmly and let the New York crowd pull her home.
That is the shape of her whole summer in miniature. In Washington she recovered a set against Elisabetta Cocciaretto and could not sustain it. In Toronto she was flat and one-sided against Alina Korneeva, her worst recent afternoon. In Cincinnati she looked much better, coming back from a slow start against Anhelina Kalinina and playing a genuinely competitive first set with Jessica Pegula before Pegula raised her own level.
The most useful detail from that Cincinnati week came from Pegula, who noticed a technical change: "She was serving much better. She changed her serve a little bit." Against an opponent who lives on short returns and forward movement, a serve that starts points on neutral terms rather than in defence is worth more than a few extra aces. Pegula's other line — "She makes you run a lot and works the points really well herself" — is the rest of Navarro's job description.
Physically there is no new injury, but the season-long backdrop is hypothyroidism, which cost her much of the spring. She says she has been feeling "gradually and gradually better and more like myself on court," and after Boisson she settled for "I'm just proud of my toughness." She also believes the top of her game is within reach: "I don't feel that far away from that." The calm that lets her lose a tie-break without unravelling is the same calm that can drift into passivity when someone starts taking her time away.
Caty McNally has found a coach who likes her odd angles
McNally's summer contained the best win of her recent stretch: a victory in Toronto over the reigning Wimbledon champion, proof that her variety and forward pressure survive elite pace. In the next round she trailed Alexandra Eala, saw Eala serve for the match, and produced a forceful late sequence to steal the second set. An early break in the decider settled it, and Eala summed it up honestly: "It was down to details and a little bit of luck."
The other side of her form is the Memphis loss to 16-year-old Kristina Liutova, where McNally held meaningful leads in both sets and watched both slip away in the closing games. In Cincinnati she went out to Anna Kalinskaya in a match decided late in each set, and her own verdict was tactical rather than emotional: she had let Kalinskaya find rhythm from the baseline, and "I wish I would've done that a little more" about disrupting it.
The coaching story matters here. Her mother stopped travelling full-time as her coach after Miami; McNally spent the clay season mostly with her physio before bringing in Kathy Rinaldi for grass and the hard courts. What she values is that Rinaldi does not sand off the unusual edges — she wanted someone who "sees my game in the same way that I do." That is precisely the coaching brief for a match like this one.
She is also carrying real belief. After Toronto: "I'm starting to play some really good tennis and proving to myself against the top players that I'm right there." No injuries reported, no physical limitation visible in Toronto, Cincinnati or the opener against Anouk Koevermans, and a dedicated hard-court training block behind her. The first round was tight for a set, then she pulled clear — cheap in the currency that matters this week, which is energy.
The match will be decided in the transition zone
Strip it down and this is a fight over court position. Navarro wants depth, repetition and one more ball; she is happy to redirect rather than invent, and she wants McNally stationed behind the baseline where the ground game is least stable. McNally cannot afford to give her that stationary target — she needs the low backhand slice, the short angle, the change of height, the serve-plus-one and the forehand approach taken slightly earlier than feels comfortable.
But charging for the sake of charging is a trap. Navarro's compact preparation makes her a good passer when an approach sits up or lands through the middle, and she can aim returns and passes at the body to deny McNally a clean volley. In the other direction, the drop shot and the short slice are live weapons: Navarro moves beautifully sideways and much less happily when she is dragged forward and back.
The head-to-head refuses to pick a side. On grass this season McNally lost the first set, then completely changed the flow, dominated the middle set and finished the comeback — evidence that once Navarro's rhythm goes, variation keeps it away. At last year's US Open, same round, McNally's errors arrived in clusters, Navarro settled, made her play the extra ball and punished the rushed finishes. One player owns the venue memory, the other owns the recent one.
The final factor is closing, and neither of them can claim it. Navarro nearly gave away a winning position on Monday and Tuesday combined; McNally has handed back commanding leads in Memphis and could not hold her momentum through the set break against Eala. The asymmetry is workload rather than proven stamina: McNally's route here was short and clean, Navarro's was long, split across two days and emotionally expensive. If this one runs deep, the question is whether McNally can keep disrupting without overpressing — or whether Navarro can turn it into the long, repetitive examination she prefers, where McNally has to hit the last shot over and over again.

Thank you for reaching the end. That's rare now.







